Method of producing fcc catalysts with reduced attrition rates

ABSTRACT

FCC catalysts having improved attrition resistance are provided by mixing a cationic polyelectrolyte with either zeolite crystals or a zeolite-forming nutrient and/or a matrix material, prior to or during formation of a catalyst microsphere.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to novel fluid catalytic crackingcatalysts comprising microspheres containing Y-faujasite zeolite andhaving exceptionally high activity and other desirable characteristics,methods for making such catalysts and the use of such catalysts forcracking petroleum feedstocks, particularly under short residence timeprocesses.

Since the 1960's, most commercial fluid catalytic cracking catalystshave contained zeolites as an active component. Such catalysts havetaken the form of small particles, called microspheres, containing bothan active zeolite component and a non-zeolite component. Frequently, thenon-zeolitic component is referred to as the matrix for the zeoliticcomponent of the catalyst. The non-zeolitic component is known toperform a number of important functions, relating to both the catalyticand physical properties of the catalyst. Oblad described those functionsas follows: “The matrix is said to act as a sink for sodium in the sievethus adding stability to the zeolite particles in the matrix catalyst.The matrix serves the additional function of: diluting the zeolite;stabilizing it towards heat and steam and mechanical attrition;providing high porosity so that the zeolite can be used to its maximumcapacity and regeneration can be made easy; and finally it provides thebulk properties that are important for heat transfer during regenerationand cracking and heat storage in large-scale catalytic cracking.” A. G.Oblad Molecular Sieve Cracking Catalysts, The Oil And Gas Journal, 70,84 (Mar. 27, 1972).

In prior art fluid catalytic cracking catalysts, the active zeoliticcomponent is incorporated into the microspheres of the catalyst by oneof two general techniques. In one technique, the zeolitic component iscrystallized and then incorporated into microspheres in a separate step.In the second technique, the in-situ technique, microspheres are firstformed and the zeolitic component is then crystallized in themicrospheres themselves to provide microspheres containing both zeoliticand non-zeolitic components.

It has long been recognized that for a fluid catalytic cracking catalystto be commercially successful, it must have commercially acceptableactivity, selectivity, and stability characteristics. It must besufficiently active to give economically attractive yields, it must havegood selectivity towards producing products that are desired and notproducing products that are not desired, and it must be sufficientlyhydrothermally stable and attrition resistant to have a commerciallyuseful life.

Generally, FCC is commercially practiced in a cyclic mode. During theseoperations, the hydrocarbon feedstock is contacted with hot, active,solid particulate catalyst without added hydrogen, for example, atpressures of up to about 50 psig and temperatures up to about650.degree. C. The catalyst is a powder with particle sizes of about20-200 microns in diameter and with an average size of approximately60-100 microns. The powder is propelled upwardly through a riserreaction zone, fluidized and thoroughly mixed with the hydrocarbon feed.The hydrocarbon feed is cracked at the aforementioned high temperaturesby the catalyst and separated into various hydrocarbon products. As thehydrocarbon feed is cracked in the presence of cracking catalyst to formgasoline and olefins, undesirable carbonaceous residue known as “coke”is deposited on the catalyst. The spent catalyst contains coke as wellas metals that are present in the feedstock. Catalysts for FCC aretypically large pore aluminosilicate compositions, including faujasiteor zeolite Y.

The coked catalyst particles are separated from the cracked hydrocarbonproducts, and after stripping, are transferred into a regenerator wherethe coke is burned off to regenerate the catalyst. The regeneratedcatalyst then flows downwardly from the regenerator to the base of theriser.

These cycles of cracking and regeneration at high flow rates andtemperatures have a tendency to physically break down the catalyst intoeven smaller particles called “fines”. These fines have a diameter of upto 20 microns as compared to the average diameter of the catalystparticle of about 60 to about 100 microns. In determining the unitretention of catalysts, and accordingly their cost efficiency, attritionresistance is a key parameter. While the initial size of the particlescan be controlled by controlling the initial spray drying of thecatalyst, if the attrition resistance is poor, the catalytic crackingunit may produce a large amount of the 0-20 micron fines which shouldnot be released into the atmosphere. Commercial catalytic cracking unitsinclude cyclones and electrostatic precipitators to prevent fines frombecoming airborne. Those skilled in the art also appreciate thatexcessive generation of catalyst fines increases the cost of catalyst tothe refiner. Excess fines can cause increased addition of catalyst anddilution of catalytically viable particles.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,902, the teachings of which are incorporated hereinby cross-reference, discloses novel fluid cracking catalysts comprisingattrition-resistant, high zeolitic content, catalytically activemicrospheres containing more than about 40%, preferably 50-70% by weightY faujasite and methods for making such catalysts by crystallizing morethan about 40% sodium Y zeolite in porous microspheres composed of amixture of two different forms of chemically reactive calcined clay,namely, metakaolin (kaolin calcined to undergo a strong endothermicreaction associated with dehydroxylation) and kaolin clay calcined underconditions more severe than those used to convert kaolin to metakaolin,i.e., kaolin clay calcined to undergo the characteristic kaolinexothermic reaction, sometimes referred to as the spinel form ofcalcined kaolin. In a preferred embodiment, the microspheres containingthe two forms of calcined kaolin clay are immersed in an alkaline sodiumsilicate solution, which is heated, preferably until the maximumobtainable amount of Y faujasite is crystallized in the microspheres.

In practice of the '902 technology, the porous microspheres in which thezeolite is crystallized are preferably prepared by forming an aqueousslurry of powdered raw (hydrated) kaolin clay (Al₂O₃:2SiO₂:2H₂O) andpowdered calcined kaolin clay that has undergone the exotherm togetherwith a minor amount of sodium silicate which acts as fluidizing agentfor the slurry that is charged to a spray dryer to form microspheres andthen functions to provide physical integrity to the components of thespray dried microspheres. The spray dried microspheres containing amixture of hydrated kaolin clay and kaolin calcined to undergo theexotherm are then calcined under controlled conditions, less severe thanthose required to cause kaolin to undergo the exotherm, in order todehydrate the hydrated kaolin clay portion of the microspheres and toeffect its conversion into metakaolin, this resulting in microspherescontaining the desired mixture of metakaolin, kaolin calcined to undergothe exotherm and sodium silicate binder. In illustrative examples of the'902 patent, about equal weights of hydrated clay and spinel are presentin the spray dryer feed and the resulting calcined microspheres containsomewhat more clay that has undergone the exotherm than metakaolin. The'902 patent teaches that the calcined microspheres comprise about 30-60%by weight metakaolin and about 40-70% by weight kaolin characterizedthrough its characteristic exotherm. A less preferred method describedin the patent, involves spray drying a slurry containing a mixture ofkaolin clay previously calcined to metakaolin condition and kaolincalcined to undergo the exotherm but without including any hydratedkaolin in the slurry, thus providing microspheres containing bothmetakaolin and kaolin calcined to undergo the exotherm directly, withoutcalcining to convert hydrated kaolin to metakaolin.

In carrying out the invention described in the '902 patent, themicrospheres composed of kaolin calcined to undergo the exotherm andmetakaolin are reacted with a caustic enriched sodium silicate solutionin the presence of a crystallization initiator (seeds) to convert silicaand alumina in the microspheres into synthetic sodium faujasite (zeoliteY). The microspheres are separated from the sodium silicate motherliquor, ion-exchanged with rare earth, ammonium ions or both to formrare earth or various known stabilized forms of catalysts. Thetechnology of the '902 patent provides means for achieving a desirableand unique combination of high zeolite content associated with highactivity, good selectivity and thermal stability, as well asattrition-resistance.

The aforementioned technology has met widespread commercial success.Because of the availability of high zeolite content microspheres whichare also attrition-resistant, custom designed catalysts are nowavailable to oil refineries with specific performance goals, such asimproved activity and/or selectivity without incurring costly mechanicalredesigns. A significant portion of the FCC catalysts presently suppliedto domestic and foreign oil refiners is based on this technology.Refineries whose FCC units are limited by the maximum tolerableregenerator temperature or by air blower capacity seek selectivityimprovements resulting in reductions in coke make while the gascompressor limitations make catalysts that reduce gas make highlydesirable. Seemingly a small reduction in coke can represent asignificant economic benefit to the operation of an FCC unit with airblower or regenerator temperature limitations.

The activity and selectivity characteristics of the catalysts formed bythe process of the '902 patent are achieved even though, in general, thecatalysts have relatively low total porosity as compared to fluidcatalytic cracking catalysts prepared by incorporating the zeolitecontent into a matrix. In particular, the microspheres of suchcatalysts, in some cases, have a total porosity of less than about 0.15cc/g. or even less than about 0.10 cc/g. In general, the microspheres ofthe '902 patent have a total porosity of less than 0.30 cc/g. As usedherein, “total porosity” means the volume of pores having diameters inthe range of 35-20,000 Å, as determined by the mercury porosimetrytechnique. The '902 patent noted that it was surprising thatmicrospheres having a total porosity of less than about 0.15 cc/g.exhibit the activity and selectivity characteristics found. For example,such a result is contrary to the prior art disclosures that low porevolumes “can lead to selectivity losses due to diffusionalrestrictions.”

It is believed that the relatively low porosity of the catalystmicrospheres formed as in the '902 patent does not adversely affectactivity and selectivity characteristics, since the microspheres of the'902 patent are not diffusion limited relative to the typical FCCprocessing conditions which were used at the time of the patent. Inparticular, catalyst contact time with the feed to be cracked wastypically 5 seconds or more. Thus, while typical FCC catalysts formed bymechanically incorporating the zeolite within a matrix may have beenmore porous, the reaction time in prior art FCC risers did not yield anyadvantage in activity or selectivity. This result inspired theconclusion that transport processes were not at all limiting in FCCcatalysts, at least outside the zeolite structure. Assertions made tothe contrary were inconsistent with the facts and easily dismissed asself-serving. Importantly, the attrition resistance of the microspheresprepared in accordance with the '902 patent was superior to theconventional FCC catalysts in which the crystallized zeolite catalyticcomponent was physically incorporated into the non-zeolitic matrix.

Recently, however, FCC apparatus have been developed which drasticallyreduce the contact time between the catalyst and the feed which is to becracked. Conventionally, the reactor is a riser in which the catalystand hydrocarbon feed enter at the bottom of the riser and aretransported through the riser. The hot catalyst effects cracking of thehydrocarbon during the passage through the riser and upon discharge fromthe riser, the cracked products are separated from the catalyst. Thecatalyst is then delivered to a regenerator where the coke is removed,thereby cleaning the catalyst and at the same time providing thenecessary heat for the catalyst in the riser reactor. The newer riserreactors operate at lower residence time and higher operatingtemperatures to minimize coke selectivity and delta coke. Several of thedesigns do not even employ a riser, further reducing contact time tobelow one second. Gasoline and dry gas selectivity can improve as aresult of the hardware changes. These FCC unit modifications aremarketed as valuable independent of the type of catalyst purchased,implying an absence of systematic problems in state of the art catalysttechnology.

The processing of increasingly heavier feeds in FCC type processes andthe tendency of such feeds to elevate coke production and yieldundesirable products have also led to new methods of contacting thefeeds with catalyst. The methods of contacting FCC catalyst for veryshort contact periods have been of particular interest. Thus, shortcontact times of less than 3 seconds in the riser, and ultra shortcontact times of 1 second or less have shown improvements in selectivityto gasoline while decreasing coke and dry gas production.

To compensate for the continuing decline in catalyst to oil contact timein FCC processing, the “equilibrium” catalysts in use have tended tobecome more active. Thus, increases in the total surface area of thecatalyst need to be achieved and as well, the level of rare earth oxidepromoters added to the catalysts are increasing. Moreover, crackingtemperatures are rising to compensate for the reduction in conversion.Unfortunately, it has been found that the API gravity of the bottomsformed during short contact time (SCT) often increases after a unitrevamp, leading some to suggest that the heaviest portion of thehydrocarbon feed takes longer to crack. Further, while a high totalsurface area of the catalyst is valued, the FCC process still valuesattrition resistance. Accordingly, while not obvious to thoseparticipating in the art, it has become increasingly likely that anoptimization of FCC catalysts for the new short contact time and ultrashort contact time processing which is presently being used is needed.

It is now theorized, that under the short contact time processing ofhydrocarbons, further improvements can be gained by eliminatingdiffusion limitations that may still exist in current catalysts. This isbeing concluded even as these materials excel at the application. It istheorized that improvements in these catalysts may be produced byoptimization of catalyst porosity and the elimination of active siteocclusion and diffusional restrictions of the binder phases present incatalysts prepared by the so-called incorporation method.

In commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,943,132, it has been found that ifthe non-zeolite, alumina-rich matrix of the catalyst is derived from anultrafine hydrous kaolin source having a particulate size such that 90wt. % of the hydrous kaolin particles are less than 2 microns, and whichis pulverized and calcined through the exotherm, a macroporous zeolitemicrosphere can be produced.

The ultrafine hydrous kaolin is dried in a spray dryer, or suitable unitoperation, then deagglomerated using high energy pulverizers, or drymilling procedures. This unit operation is practiced to reduceagglomerates and return calciner feed to a particle size similar to whatwas measured in a slurry as noted above. The presence of agglomeratedstructures alter the particle size and bulk density properties of thecalcined kaolin. During phase change from hydrous kaolin, agglomerationand sintering occurs. The measured particle size coarsens throughout theparticle size ranges. Large agglomerated structures have higher densitythus lower porosity. Structuring prior to calcination expands the porevolume by cementing particle contact points, which in fully calcinedkaolins are theoretically maintained by expelled amorphous silica. Thethermal transition to spinel expels one mol of silica per mol of spinelformed. Mullite transition from spinel expels four additional mols.

More generally, the FCC catalyst matrix useful in this invention toachieve FCC catalyst macroporosity is derived from alumina sources, suchas kaolin calcined through the exotherm, that have a specified waterpore volume, which distinguishes over prior art calcined kaolin used toform the catalyst matrix. The water pore volume is derived from anIncipient Slurry Point (ISP) test, which is described in the patent.

The morphology of the microsphere catalysts which are formed accordingto U.S. Pat. No. 6,943,132 is unique relative to the in-situ microspherecatalysts formed previously. Use of a pulverized, ultrafine hydrouskaolin calcined through the exotherm yields in-situ zeolite microsphereshaving a macroporous structure in which the macropores of the structureare essentially coated or lined with zeolite subsequent tocrystallization. Macroporosity as defined herein means the catalyst hasa macropore volume in the pore range of 600-20,000 Å of at least 0.07cc/gm mercury intrusion. The catalysts also have a BET surface area lessthan 500 m²/g. The novel catalyst is optimal for FCC processing,including the short contact time processing in which the hydrocarbonfeed is contacted with a catalyst is for times of about 3 seconds orless.

High porosity within the microsphere is important to maximize catalyticactivity by eliminating typical rate reductions due to diffusion of thecrude oil molecules within the microsphere structure. As the porosity ofa microsphere is increased, however, the rate at which the microspherefractures and attrits into finer particles within the FCC unit operatingenvironment increases; resulting in increased fresh catalyst additionrates and increased particulate emission from the unit. Processing orcompositional mechanisms for reducing the rate at which an FCC catalystattrits for a given total pore volume is of fundamental importance toimproving the performance and corresponding value of the catalyst.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Improved attrition resistance is provided to in-situ formed FCCcatalysts by adding a cationic polyelectrolyte to a kaolin slurry, priorto processing into a microsphere substrate for subsequent zeolitegrowth.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a plot of air jet attrition results for inventive andcomparative catalysts relative to the pore volume of the catalysts.

FIG. 2 is a plot of Roller attrition results relative to catalyst porevolume.

FIG. 3 is a plot of air jet attrition results for inventive andcomparative catalysts relative to the pore volume of the catalysts.

FIG. 4 is a plot of Roller attrition results relative to catalyst porevolume.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The catalyst microspheres of this invention are produced by the generalprocess as disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,902. It ispreferred, although not required, that the non-zeolitic, alumina-richmatrix of the catalysts of the present invention be derived from ahydrous kaolin source that is in the form of an ultrafine powder inwhich at least 90 wt. % of the particles are less than 2.0 microns,preferably at least 70 wt. % less than 1 micron as disclosed inaforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,943,132. The ultrafine hydrous kaolin ispulverized and calcined through the exotherm. It is also within thescope of this invention that the zeolite microspheres be formed with analumina-rich matrix derived from kaolin having a larger size, and whichis calcined at least substantially through its characteristic exotherm.Satintone® No. 1, (a commercially available kaolin that has beencalcined through its characteristic exotherm without any substantialformation of mullite) is a material used on a commercial basis to formthe alumina-rich matrix. Satintone® No. 1 is derived from a hydrouskaolin in which 70% of the particles are less than 2 microns. Othersources used to form the alumina-rich matrix include finely dividedhydrous kaolin (e.g., ASP® 600, a commercially available hydrous kaolindescribed in Engelhard Technical Bulletin No. TI-1004, entitled“Aluminum Silicate Pigments” (EC-1167)) calcined at least substantiallythrough its characteristic exotherm. Booklet clay has found the mostwidespread commercial use and has met tremendous success worldwide.

The general procedure for manufacturing the FCC microspheres of thisinvention is well-known in the art and can be followed from theprocedure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,902. As disclosed therein, anaqueous slurry of reactive finely divided hydrous kaolin and/ormetakaolin and alumina-containing material, which forms the matrix suchas the ultrafine kaolin that has been calcined through itscharacteristic exotherm, is prepared. The aqueous slurry is then spraydried to obtain microspheres comprising a mixture of hydrous kaolinand/or metakaolin and kaolin that has been calcined at leastsubstantially through its characteristic exotherm to form thehigh-alumina matrix. Preferably, a moderate amount of sodium silicate isadded to the aqueous slurry before it is spray dried to function as abinder between the kaolin particles.

The reactive kaolin of the slurry to form the microspheres can be formedof hydrated kaolin or calcined hydrous kaolin (metakaolin) or mixturesthereof. The hydrous kaolin of the feed slurry can suitably be eitherone or a mixture of ASP® 600 or ASP® 400 kaolin, derived from coarsewhite kaolin crudes. Finer particle size hydrous kaolins can also beused, including those derived from gray clay deposits, such as LHT Rpigment. Purified water-processed kaolin clays from Middle Georgia havebeen used with success. Calcined products of these hydrous kaolins canbe used as the metakaolin component of the feed slurry.

The novel microspheres demonstrating reduced rates of attrition aregenerally produced from a blend of hydrous kaolin particles and calcinedkaolin particles. The composition of the blend is typically 25 parts to75 parts hydrous kaolin and 75 to 25 parts calcined kaolin. Hydrouskaolin particles are approximately 0.20 to 10 microns in diameter asmeasured by Sedigraph that have been slurried in water in a solids rangeof 30 to 80 wt % as limited by process viscosity with an appropriatedispersant addition. Preferably 90 wt % or more of the particles areless than 2 micron in size. The calcined kaolin consists of kaolinitethat has been heated past its exothermic crystalline phasetransformation to form spinel (what some authorities refer to as adefect aluminum-silicon spinel or a gamma alumina phase) or mullite.

Silicate for the binder is preferably provided by sodium silicates withSiO₂ to Na₂O ratios of from 1.5 to 3.5 and especially preferred ratiosof from 2.88 to 3.22.

The binder is then added at a level of 0 to 15 wt % (when measured asSiO₂) prior to spray drying the slurry to form ceramic porous beads thataverage in particle size from 20 to 200 um. The spray dried beads arethen heated beyond the kaolinite endothermic transition that initiatesat 550° C. to form metakaolin. The resulting microspheres are thencrystallized, base exchanged, calcined, and typically but not alwaysbased exchanged and calcined a second time.

A quantity (e.g., 1 to 30% by weight of the kaolin) of zeolite initiatormay also be added to the aqueous slurry before it is spray dried. Asused herein, the term “zeolite initiator” shall include any materialcontaining silica and alumina that either allows a zeolitecrystallization process that would not occur in the absence of theinitiator or shortens significantly the zeolite crystallization processthat would occur in the absence of the initiator. Such materials arealso known as “zeolite seeds”. The zeolite initiator may or may notexhibit detectable crystallinity by x-ray diffraction.

Adding zeolite initiator to the aqueous slurry of kaolin before it isspray dried into microspheres is referred to herein as “internalseeding”. Alternatively, zeolite initiator may be mixed with the kaolinmicrospheres after they are formed and before the commencement of thecrystallization process, a technique which is referred to herein as“external seeding”.

The zeolite initiator used in the present invention may be provided froma number of sources. For example, the zeolite initiator may compriserecycled fines produced during the crystallization process itself. Otherzeolite initiators that may be used include fines produced during thecrystallization process of another zeolite product or an amorphouszeolite initiator in a sodium silicate solution. As used herein,“amorphous zeolite initiator” shall mean a zeolite initiator thatexhibits no detectable crystallinity by x-ray diffraction.

The seeds may be prepared as disclosed by in U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,902.Especially preferred seeds are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,631,262.

After spray drying, the microspheres may be calcined directly, oralternatively acid-neutralized to further enhance ion exchange of thecatalysts after crystallization. The acid-neutralization processcomprises co-feeding uncalcined, spray dried microspheres and mineralacid to a stirred slurry at controlled pH. The rates of addition ofsolids and acid are adjusted to maintain a pH of about 2 to 7, mostpreferably from about 2.5 to 4.5 with a target of about 3 pH. The sodiumsilicate binder is gelled to silica and a soluble sodium salt, which issubsequently filtered and washed free from the microspheres. The silicagel-bound microspheres are then calcined. In either case, calcination isdone at a temperature and for a time (e.g., for two hours in a mufflefurnace at a chamber temperature of about 1,350° F.) sufficient toconvert any hydrated kaolin component of the microspheres to metakaolin, leaving the previously calcined kaolin components of themicrospheres essentially unchanged. The resulting calcined porousmicrospheres comprise a mixture of metakaolin and kaolin clay calcinedthrough its characteristic exotherm in which the two types of calcinedkaolin are present in the same microspheres. Alternatively, anyappropriate calcined alumina can replace the kaolin calcined through theexotherm as previously described.

Y-faujasite is allowed to crystallize by mixing the calcined kaolinmicrospheres with the appropriate amounts of other constituents(including at least sodium silicate and water), as discussed in U.S.Pat. No. 4,493,902, and then heating the resulting slurry to atemperature and for a time (e.g., to 200°-215° F. for 10-24 hours)sufficient to crystallize Y-faujasite in the microspheres. Theprescriptions of U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,902 may be followed as written.

After the crystallization process is terminated, the microspherescontaining Y-faujasite are separated from at least a substantial portionof their mother liquor, e.g., by filtration. It may be desirable to washto microspheres by contacting them with water either during or after thefiltration step. Retained silica is controlled in the synthesis productto different levels. The silica forms a silica gel that impartsfunctionality for specific finished product applications.

The microspheres that are filtered contain Y-faujasite zeolite in thesodium form. Typically, the microspheres contain more than about 8% byweight Na₂O. To prepare the microspheres as active catalysts, asubstantial portion of the sodium ions in the microspheres are replacedby ammonium or rare earth ions or both.

Ion exchange may be conducted by a number of different ion exchangemethods. Preferably, the microspheres are first exchanged one or moretimes with an ammonium salt such as ammonium nitrate or sulfate solutionat a pH of about 3. A typical design base exchange process would havemultiple filter belts which process the product countercurrent toexchange solution flow. The number of equilibrium stages is determinedby the total sodium to be removed and optimization of chemical cost. Atypical process contains 3 to 6 equilibrium stages in each base exchangeprocess. The ion exchange(s) with ammonium ions are preferably followedby one or more ion exchanges with rare earth ions at a pH of about 3.The rare earth may be provided as a single rare earth material or as amixture of rare earth materials. Preferably, the rare earth is providedin the form on nitrates or chlorides. The preferred microspheres of theinvention are ion exchanged to contain between 0% and 12% by weight REO,most preferably 1% to 5% by weight REO and less than about 0.5, morepreferably as low as 0.1% by weight Na₂O. As is well known, anintermediate calcination will be required to reach these soda levels.

After ion exchange is completed, the microspheres are dried. Many dryerdesigns can be used including drum, flash, and spray drying. Theprocedure described above for ion exchanging the FCC microspherecatalysts of this invention is well-known and, as such, such process,per se, does not form the basis of this invention.

The present invention is directed to improving the attrition resistanceof the zeolite-containing FCC catalyst formed by the process describedabove. To this end, a cationic polyelectrolyte is added to a kaolinslurry prior to processing into a microsphere substrate for subsequentzeolite growth. The cationic polyelectrolyte addition decreases theattrition rate of the resulting FCC catalyst as measured by air jet(ASTM method D5757-00) and Roller attrition tests relative to controlcatalyst samples generated without the polyelectrolyte addition at thesame total catalyst pore volume. The exact mechanism resulting in theimproved attrition is under investigation, but polyelectrolytes areknown and utilized in paper coating and filling applications requiringthe flocculation of hydrous and calcined kaolin particles. The additionof polyelectrolyte to the hydrous and calcined kaolin slurry blend isbelieved to impart localized structure through the formation of fineaggregates that is maintained through the spray drying and calcinationsteps of the microsphere formation process. The polyelectrolyte additionalso enables reduction in the amount of binder (typically sodiumsilicate) needed without detrimentally decreasing the microspheremechanical strength prior to zeolite Y crystallization.

The amount of the cationic polyelectrolyte added to the kaolin slurry isminimal and, yet, substantial improvement in attrition resistance hasbeen found in the finished catalyst. Thus, amounts of about 0.1 to 10lbs of polyelectrolyte per ton of dry kaolin (uncalcined and calcined)have been found to yield the desired results. More preferably, 0.5 to 2lbs per ton, or 0.025 to 0.1 wt. %, polyelectrolyte to the total kaolincontent on a dry basis is effectively added. It should be understoodthat the percentage of polyelectrolyte used is based on all kaolinsolids present in the slurry used to form the microsphere, prior tozeolite crystallization. The specific process description relates to theuse of the polyelectrolyte with hydrous and calcined kaolin slurriesused to form microspheres, but is not limited to those materials.Incorporation of an appropriate polyelectrolyte with other metal oxideprecursors that may be used as matrix or future zeolite nutrient may beused. Non-limiting examples include alumina, aluminum hydroxide, silicaand alumina-silica materials such as clays. The application of thedescribed invention utilizes the in situ FCC manufacturing approach, butcould easily be translated to use within an incorporated catalystprocess as well.

The cationic polyelectrolytes useful in this invention are known in theart as bulking agents to flocculate hydrous kaolin in paper filling andcoating applications. Many such agents are also known as flocculants toincrease the rate at which clay slurries filter. See, for example, U.S.Pat. Nos. 4,174,279 and 4,767,466. Useful cationic polyelectrolyteflocculants include polyamines, quaternary ammonium salts, diallylammonium polymer salts, dimethyl dially ammonium chloride (polydadmacs).Cationic polyelectrolyte flocculants are characterized by a high densityof positive charge as determined by dividing the total number positivecharges per molecule by the molecular weight (MW). The MW of thechemistries are estimated to be between 10,000 and 1,000,000 (e.g.between 50,000 and 250,000) with positive charge densities generallyexceeding 1×10⁻³. Such materials do not contain anionic groups such ascarboxyl or carbonyl groups. While we do not wish to be limited by anyparticulars of the reaction mechanisms, we believe that the clay mineralcations such as H⁺, Na⁺, and Ca⁺⁺ are replaced with the positivelycharged polymeric portion of the cationic polyelectrolyte at theoriginal mineral cation location and that this replacement reduces thenegative charge on the clay particles which in turn leads to coalescenceby mutual attraction. Charge centers near the end of the polymer chainreact and bridge with neighboring particles until the accessible claycation exchange centers or the polymer charge centers are exhausted. Thebridging strengthens the bond between the particles, thereby providing ahighly shear resistant, bulked clay mineral composition. The presence ofchloride ions in the filtrate in the case of dimethyldiallyl ammoniumchloride may be an indication that at least one stage of the reactionbetween clay particles and quaternary salt polymer occurs by anion-exchange mechanism.

The Kemira Superfloc C-500 series polyamines are liquid, cationicpolymers of differing molecular weights. They work effectively asprimary coagulants and charge neutralization agents in liquid-solidseparation processes in a wide variety of industries. The chemistryrange available ensures there is a product suitable for each individualapplication. Many, if not all of the above products have branchedpolymer chains.

MAGNAFLOC LT7989, LT7990 and LT7991 from BASF are also polyaminescontained in about 50% solution and useful in this invention.

In addition to the alkyldiallyl quaternary ammonium salts, otherquaternary ammonium cationic flocculants are obtained by copolymerizingaliphatic secondary amines with epichlorohydrin. Still otherwater-soluble cationic polyelectrolytes are poly (quaternary ammonium)polyether salts that contain quaternary nitrogen in the polymericbackbone and are chain extended by ether groups. They are prepared fromwater-soluble poly (quaternary ammonium salts) containing pendanthydroxyl groups and bifunctionally reactive chain extending agents; suchpolyelectrolytes are prepared by treating an N,N,N⁽¹⁾,N⁽¹⁾tetraalkylhydroxyalkylenediamine and an organic dihalide such asdihydroalkane or a dihaloether with an epoxy haloalkane. Suchpolyelectrolytes and their use in flocculating clay are disclosed inU.S. Pat. No. 3,663,461.

Example 1

Inventive samples were generated by blending hydrous and calcined kaolinslurries consisting of 37.5 dry wt. % hydrous kaolin and 62.5 dry wt. %calcined kaolin to a total slurry solids level of ˜50% by weight. Thephysical properties of note related to the hydrous and calcined kaolincomponents are detailed in Tables 1 and 2. The +325 mesh residue is thecoarse material that does not pass through a 325 mesh screen (44 umspacing between screen mesh). The %<1 um and %<2 um classifications arethe wt. % of the particles less than 1 or 2 um in equivalent sphericaldiameter as measured by Sedigraph 5200. The calcined kaolin consists ofmaterial that has been heated beyond the characteristic exothermictransition that initiates at ˜950° C. to form what is often referred toas the spinel phase or the mullite phase or a combination of the twophases. The Mullite index (MI) is the ratio of the mullite peak in thekaolin sample to a 100% mullite reference sample indicating the degreeof heat treatment for the calcined kaolin. The apparent bulk density(ABD) is the weight per unit volume of the material including the voidfraction. The tamped bulk density (TBD) is a measure of the bulk densityfollowing work input to encourage more efficient particle packing asmeasured with a TAP-PACK Volumeter (ISO 787-11).

TABLE 1 Physical properties of hydrous kaolin used in inventive andcomparative sample preparations. Material +325 mesh residue % <1 umHydrous kaolin <0.5% 76 to 80

TABLE 2 Physical properties of calcined kaolin used in inventive andcomparative sample preparations +325 mesh % < 2 % < 1 Material MI ABDTBD residue um um Calcined 30 to 45 0 to 0.5 0.4 to 0.5 0 to 5 60 to 7535 to 50 kaolin

Superfloc C577 (cationic polyamine) per ton of dry clay (both hydrousand calcined) was mixed using a standard air powered mixer into theslurry at a dosage of 1.0 dry pound of polymer per ton of dry clay. Thepolyamine was diluted to 1% solids prior to dosing the kaolin slurry.Sodium silicate grade #40 (3.22 modulus or 3.22 parts SiO₂ per 1.0 partsof Na₂O) was added as a binder at a dosage of 4 wt. % on an SiO₂ basis.Alternatively, inventive samples were generated containing no binder, 0wt. % on an SiO₂ basis addition of sodium silicate. The slurry was spraydried to form microspheres with an average particle size (APS) of 80 to90 microns as measured by laser particle size analysis (Microtrac SRA150). The drying method was selected for convenience and other dryingmethods would be equally effective to reduce product moisture to below2% by weight (OEM Labwave 9000 moisture analyzer). The resultingmicrospheres were calcined in a laboratory furnace at 815° C. (1500° F.)for 1 hour.

The comparative sample was generated from the same kaolin startingcomponents using the same procedure except that the cationic polyaminewas not added and twice the amount of sodium silicate (8 wt. % on SiO₂basis to kaolin) was added to the material. Inventive samples I throughIE were generated with varying dosages of nutrient metakaolinmicrospheres added in order to vary resulting microsphere total porevolume.

Following microsphere formation, zeolite crystallization was performedusing the following compositions identified in Table 3 where seeds werefine alumino-silicate particles used to initiate zeolite crystallizationand growth. Sodium silicate with a composition of 21.6 wt % SiO₂ and11.6 wt % Na₂O (1.87 modulus as defined as parts SiO₂ to parts Na₂O) wasrecycled and generated from commercial production of microsphere.Nutrient microspheres, consisting primarily of metakaolin which aresoluble in the basic crystallization environment, served as a nutrientsource for continued zeolite Y growth. The seeds used to initiatezeolite crystallization are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,902, andespecially preferred U.S. Pat. No. 4,631,262.

TABLE 3 FCC catalyst crystallization recipe Polyamine PolyaminePolyamine Polyamine Polyamine Polyamine 1F: 1#/ton, Control I: 1#/tonIB: 1#/ton IC: 1#/ton ID: 1#/ton 1E: 1#/ton no binder Seeds (g) 75.075.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 1.87 modulus 697.0 826.5 870.8 915.2 959.91004.9 921.1 Sodium Silicate (g) 19% Caustic (g) 96.4 92.5 84.5 76.568.4 60.3 83.0 Water (g) 150.0 135.7 138.1 140.6 143.0 145.4 122.1Microspheres (g) 236.2 230.6 225.7 220.9 216.0 211.1 229.6 Nutrient 13.819.4 24.3 29.1 34.0 38.9 20.4 Microspheres (g)

The following procedure was taken directly from US Publication No.2012/0228194 A1. The Y-faujasite was allowed to crystallize by mixingthe calcined kaolin microspheres with the appropriate amounts of otherconstituents (including at least sodium silicate and water), asdisclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,809, the teachings of which are hereinincorporated by reference, and then heating the resulting slurry to atemperature and for a time (e.g., to 200° to 215° F. for 10-24 hours)sufficient to crystallize Y-faujasite in the microspheres. Themicrospheres were crystallized to a desired zeolite content (typicallyca. 50-65), filtered, washed, ammonium exchanged, exchanged withrare-earth cations, calcined, exchanged a second time with ammoniumions, and calcined for a second time.

Table 4 lists the physical properties of the resulting samples followingcrystallization and the subsequent rounds of ion exchange andcalcination. The sample labeled “Control” contained no polyamines.Inventive examples are labeled Polyamine: 1A-1F. Total surface area(TSA), matrix surface area (MSA), and zeolite surface area (ZSA) weredetermined by BET analysis of nitrogen adsorption isotherms using aMicromeritics TriStar or TriStar 2 instrument. While the samples formedin this example yielded high activity/high surface area catalysts, theinvention herein is not intended to be limited by the surface area orcatalytic activity of the catalyst formed. This invention encompassesthe improvement in attrition resistance regardless of the activity ofthe catalyst.

Following initial testing of the as produced catalysts, steaming wasperformed to simulate deactivated or equilibrium catalyst physicalproperties from a refinery. The process consists of steaming thecatalyst at 1500° F. for 4 or more hours. Catalyst porosity wasdetermined by the mercury porosimetry technique using a MicromeriticsAutopore 4. Total pore volume is the cumulative volume of pores havingdiameters in the range of 35 to 20,000 Å. Unit cell size of theresulting zeolite Y crystallites was determined by the techniquedescribed in ASTM standard method of testing titled “Relative ZeoliteDiffraction Intensities” (Designation D3906-80) or by an equivalenttechnique.

TABLE 4 Catalyst physical properties Polyamine Polyamine PolyaminePolyamine Polyamine IB: 1 IC: 1 ID: 1 Polyamine I: 1 #/ton, Control IA:1#/ton #/ton #/ton #/ton IE: 1 #/ton no binder Total Surface Area 376385 385 362 371 392 392 (m2/g) Matrix Surface Area 86 92 93 90 94 97 91(m2/g) Zeolite Surface Area 290 294 292 272 277 295 302 (m2/g) Zeoliteto matrix 3.37 3.20 3.14 3.02 2.95 3.04 3.32 surface area ratio SteamedTotal 250 261 259 216 206 254 247 Surface Area (m2/g) Steamed Matrix 6673 74 63 66 74 71 Surface Area (m2/g) Steamed Zeolite 183 188 184 153140 180 176 Surface Area (m2/g) Steamed Zeolite to 2.77 2.58 2.49 2.432.12 2.43 2.48 matrix surface area ratio Total Pore Volume 0.359 0.3820.390 0.375 0.364 0.353 0.377 (cm3/g) Unit Cell Size (Å) 24.48 24.4824.48

FIG. 1 is a plot of the air jet attrition results obtained for theinventive and comparative samples versus pore volume. Air jet attritionrate values were determined using an in-house unit following ASTMstandard method D5757. For a given catalyst manufacturing method andcomposition, attrition rate increases as the porosity of the givencatalyst particles is increased. Addition of the polyelectrolyteflocculant prior to microsphere formation modifies the packing of theresulting particles prior to microsphere formation resulting in aceramic structure that is more resistant to attrition. In particular,the resulting novel catalyst structure exhibits increased resistance toattrition resulting from an abrasion type failure mechanism (attritionof small particles relative to the total size of the original particle).FIG. 1 illustrates the reduction observed in attrition rate for theinventive samples at equivalent or higher total pore volumes than thecomparative example.

FIG. 2 is a plot of attrition results from a Roller Attrition Testerversus total catalyst pore volume. The Roller method is a more severetest resulting in increased catalyst attrition resulting from particlefracture (particle breakage into two or more large pieces of theoriginal whole particle). Again, the inventive samples showed reducedattrition rate for an equivalent to increased total pore volume (up to0.03 cm³/g increased porosity). The inventive sample generated with nosodium silicate added as binder showed improved performance with respectto attrition resulting from abrasion, but was only comparable to thecontrol in the more aggressive Roller testing. Given that populationbalance modeling of commercial FCC units indicates that abrasion is thepredominant attrition mechanism versus fracture, the sample formed withpolyamine and no binder is a step change improvement in performancerelative to the comparative example.

Example 2

The same hydrous and calcined kaolin components were utilized togenerate inventive microspheres with varying dosage of Superfloc C577 orwith alternative cationic polyelectrolyte chemistries added. Thepolyamine addition was in the same manner as Example 1 with a reducedbinder dosage of 4 wt % SiO₂ as sodium silicate. The comparative samplelabeled “Control” was formed with 8 wt % SiO₂ as sodium silicate addedprior to spray drying. Tables 5A and 5B contain the formulationsutilized to crystallize each of the microsphere samples for processingto finished catalyst.

Inventive examples labeled Polyamine IA-IF were generated with SuperflocC577. Inventive samples labeled Polyamine IA through IC were generatedwith 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 #/ton of polyamine added. Inventive sampleslabeled Polyamine IC through IF all contained 2.0 #/ton of SuperflocC577 charged, but were formulated to generate final catalysts withvarying total porosity. Inventive sample Polyamine II was generated with1 #/ton of SuperFloc C572 described commercially as a linear, lowmolecular weight polyamine. Inventive sample Polyamine III was generatedwith 1 #/ton of SuperFloc C573 described commercially as a branched, lowmolecular weight polyamine. Polyamine IV was generated with 1 #/ton ofSuperFloc C581 described commercially as a branched, high molecularweight polyamine.

TABLE 5A FCC catalyst crystallization recipe Polyamine IA: 0.5 PolyaminePolyamine Polaymine Polyamine Polyamine Control #/ton IB: 1#/ton IC:2#/ton ID: 2#/ton IE: 2#/ton IF: 2#/ton Seeds (g) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.060.0 60.0 60.0 1.87 mod Sodium 649.6 579.8 579.8 579.8 618.1 586.6 555.4Silicate (g) 19% Caustic (g) 50.2 59.6 59.6 59.6 57.2 59.2 61.5 Water(g) 205.9 206.5 206.5 206.5 199.5 192.1 184.8 Microspheres (g) 176.7177.8 177.8 177.8 180.6 184.5 188.4 Nutrient 23.3 22.2 22.2 22.2 19.415.5 11.6 Microspheres (g)

TABLE 5B FCC catalyst crystallization recipe Polyamine II Polyamine IIIPolyamine IV Seeds (g) 60.0 60.0 60.0 1.87 mod Sodium 579.8 579.8 579.8Silicate (g) 19% Caustic (g) 59.6 59.6 59.6 Water (g) 206.5 206.5 206.5Microspheres (g) 177.8 177.8 177.8 Nutrient Micro- 22.2 22.2 22.2spheres (g)Tables 6A and 6B contain physical property data collected from each ofthe resulting catalyst final products. The attrition results as measuredby air jet (FIG. 3) and Roller attrition (FIG. 4) demonstrate theimproved performance of the inventive catalyst for a comparable totalpore volume relative to the comparative examples.

TABLE 6A Catalyst physical properties Polyamine IA: 0.5 PolyaminePolyamine Polaymine Polyamine Polyamine Control #/ton IB: 1#/ton IC:2#/ton ID: 2#/ton IE: 2#/ton IF: 2#/ton TSA (m²/g) 406 417 404 448 397388 388 MSA (m²/g) 90 93 92 93 86 92 90 ZSA (m²/g) 316 324 312 355 311296 298 Z/M ratio 3.51 3.48 3.39 3.82 3.60 3.20 3.31 STSA (m²/g) 257 280260 284 249 252 257 SMSA (m²/g) 69.0 67.0 71.0 69 70 71 72 SZSA (m²/g)189 213 188 215 179 181 185 SZ/M ratio 2.74 3.18 2.65 3.12 2.56 2.572.57 Total Pore 0.2817 0.2719 0.2381 0.2981 0.3136 0.3176 0.3254 Volume(cm³/g) Unit Cell Size 24.51 24.5 24.53 (Å)

TABLE 6B Catalyst physical properties Polyamine Polyamine PolyamineControl II III IV TSA (m²/g) 406 411 400 407 MSA (m²/g) 90 97 86 93 ZSA(m²/g) 316 314 314 314 Z/M ratio 3.51 3.24 3.65 3.38 STSA (m²/g) 257 266275 265 SMSA (m²/g) 69.0 71.0 74.0 71.0 SZSA (m²/g) 189 196 202 193 SZ/Mratio 2.74 2.76 2.73 2.72 Total Pore Volume 0.2817 0.3098 0.2572 0.2922(cm³/g) Unit Cell Size (Å) 24.51

1. An FCC zeolite-containing catalyst microsphere comprising zeolite,said microsphere formed from at least one of a zeolite-forming nutrientor zeolite crystals and a matrix, at least one of said zeolite crystals,said zeolite-forming nutrient or said matrix being mixed with 0.005 to0.5 wt. % of a cationic polyelectrolyte relative to the weight of saidzeolite crystals or zeolite-forming nutrient and said matrix, prior toor during formation of said microsphere.
 2. The catalyst of claim 1,wherein said microsphere is 20-200 microns.
 3. The catalyst of claim 1,wherein said microsphere is formed from said zeolite-forming nutrientand said matrix, and said zeolite is formed in situ.
 4. The catalyst ofclaim 3, wherein said zeolite-forming nutrient is metakaolin.
 5. Thecatalyst of claim 4, wherein said matrix is formed from kaolin that hasbeen calcined through its exotherm.
 6. The catalyst of claim 1, whereinsaid cationic polyelectrolyte is a polyamine.
 7. The catalyst of claim4, wherein said cationic polyelectrolyte is polyamine.
 8. The catalystof claim 6, wherein said polyamine is mixed with said zeolite-formingnutrient and said matrix.
 9. The catalyst of claim 6, wherein saidpolyamine is mixed with said zeolite-forming nutrient and said matrix inan amount of from about 0.025 to 0.1 wt. %, relative to the weight ofsaid zeolite-forming nutrient and said matrix.
 10. The catalyst of claim1, wherein said microsphere is formed from zeolite crystals and saidmatrix.
 11. The method of claim 6, wherein said polyamine has amolecular weight of between 10,000 and 1,000,000.
 12. A method of makingan FCC catalyst microsphere comprising forming a slurry of eitherzeolite crystals or hydrous kaolin, metakaolin or both of said kaolinsand a matrix, mixing with said slurry, a cationic polyelectrolyte, spraydrying said slurry into microspheres and, if needed, reacting saidmicrospheres with a silicate to form catalyst microspheres containingzeolite crystals formed in-situ, said cationic polyelectrolytecomprising 0.005 to 0.5 wt. % of said slurry relative to said zeolitecrystals or said kaolin and matrix.
 13. The method of claim 12, whereinsaid catalyst microspheres are 20-200 microns in diameter.
 14. Themethod of claim 12, wherein said matrix is kaolin calcined through theexotherm.
 15. The method of claim 12, wherein said cationicpolyelectrolyte is a polyamine.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein saidpolyamine has a molecular weight of between 10,000 and 1,000,000. 17.The method of claim 12, wherein said cationic polyelectrolyte is presentin said slurry in an amount of from 0.025 to 0.1 wt. % relative to theamount of said zeolite crystals or said kaolin and matrix.
 18. Themethod of claim 12, wherein said slurry contains hydrous kaolin and/ormetakaolin, and said microspheres are reacted with a silicate to formzeolite crystals in-situ.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein saidmatrix is kaolin calcined through the exotherm.
 20. The method of claim19, wherein said kaolin calcined through the exotherm is formed from anultrafine hydrous kaolin having at least 90 wt. % of the particles lessthan 2 microns.